claymore wrote:Square cut punts were obtainable fom Hunt,Lunt and Cunningham.
Those were square cut punts, not a punt cut square
You are Chic Murray AICMFP.
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor
Do you think we could sell this technique to one of the mags as a man overboard recovery method? It could be amusing to see the reports of experiments ...
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor
My biggest worry would be concerned with which bits of the casualty's anatomy were most likely to be left on the guardrail.
If it was Shard it would probably be an ankle - Nick and myself may well find rather more important bits being risked, us being shorter in stature - or would the opposite apply?
ash wrote:
You look very well for someone who started reading boaty magazines at such a young age
I've got a couple of bound volumes of YM from the twenties. They make fascinating reading. Clearly the two important yachting centres then were Burnham and the Clyde - the Solent was much less important, though there were a fair number of builders there.
Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity - Hanlon's Razor But don't rule out malice - First Corollary to Hanlon's Razor