Page 1 of 2

Snaw flakes

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 5:32 pm
by mm5aho
Surely the snowflakes should be raindrops - far more appropriate. (or even a wave?)

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:52 pm
by Nick
.
Snow's coming.

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 4:37 pm
by claymore
What snowflakes?

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 8:46 pm
by sahona
Lower Clyde this afternoon, so no doubt krappy driving further inland...

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2016 11:40 pm
by ash
Nick wrote:.
Snow's coming.
We have 60mm of snow here in Neilston, at 350M, and -1 C.

Ash

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 9:17 pm
by Telo
Nane here, but Ash, when did your snow go metric? We're still behind the curve in Stirling.

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Sat Jan 09, 2016 10:42 pm
by ash
Shard wrote:Nane here, but Ash, when did your snow go metric? .
I confess that I did start off thinking "there's almost 3 inches of snow"

I've jumped back and forth between imperial and metric throughout my education and working life, but now mainly think and work in metric.

Ash

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 12:50 am
by aquaplane
When talking willies 4" = 20cm, a simple conversion, but it's what you do with it that matters.

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 2:01 am
by Alan_D
aquaplane wrote:When talking willies 4" = 20cm, a simple conversion
What a curious way of measuring the depth of snow.

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 2:13 am
by Telo
ash wrote:
Shard wrote:Nane here, but Ash, when did your snow go metric? .
I confess that I did start off thinking "there's almost 3 inches of snow"

I've jumped back and forth between imperial and metric throughout my education and working life, but now mainly think and work in metric.

Ash
Hah! The industry I was in went metric in 1971. Until then, copper conductors were graded by poundage per mile.

The changes never really caused a problem, except for the wee guys who had trouble stepping out cable lengths in metres rather than yards........ ;)

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 9:44 am
by mm5aho
Its taken me 20 years to get used to imperial units. (NZ went metric in 1967).
I remember a guy phoning (work) saying he had " two hundred weight" of steel to process. Not having encountered this unit, I asked how heavy was one weight (in order to get a feel for how heavy 200 weights might be).

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 1:58 pm
by claymore
Alan_D wrote:
aquaplane wrote:When talking willies 4" = 20cm, a simple conversion
What a curious way of measuring the depth of snow.
Sticking yer willie in it?

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Sun Jan 10, 2016 10:40 pm
by sahona
Shrinking violet?

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 2:09 am
by Aja
Alan_D wrote:
aquaplane wrote:When talking willies 4" = 20cm, a simple conversion
What a curious way of measuring the depth of snow.
12" but I never use it as a rule :cry:

Donald

Re: Snaw flakes

Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2016 9:49 am
by claymore
Aja wrote:
Alan_D wrote:
aquaplane wrote:When talking willies 4" = 20cm, a simple conversion
What a curious way of measuring the depth of snow.
12" but I never use it as a rule :cry:

Donald
He said he was a foot in front......

Did you get my PM Donald?