Page 2 of 2
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:54 pm
by Silkie
Ocklepoint wrote:There was one question that I really did not understand...
It wasn't 16 by any chance? I marked every option as a 1 and as well as giving my opinion about what I thought might make the biggest difference to boating over the next 4 years I also opined that gobbledy-gook like Q16 would have absolutely no impact.
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:23 pm
by Ocklepoint
And what did you think would make the biggest difference to boating over the next four years?
I said something about as yet unforeseen and unexpected EU directives.
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 12:31 pm
by cpedw
I struggled through it too, but found I couldn't relate to a lot of the questions. Thanks for letting us know about it - will our numbers be sufficient to influence the results?
It's surprising that the RYA seems largely irrelevant for cruising folk; I value the training I've received (day skipper, coastal skipper, radar, VHF courses) but then I don't have anything else to compare it with.
Derek
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:19 pm
by aquaplane
cpedw wrote:I struggled through it too, but found I couldn't relate to a lot of the questions. Thanks for letting us know about it - will our numbers be sufficient to influence the results?
It's surprising that the RYA seems largely irrelevant for cruising folk; I value the training I've received (day skipper, coastal skipper, radar, VHF courses) but then I don't have anything else to compare it with.
Derek
I get the impression that my sort of sailing could carry on quite nicely without the RYA. Folks that are interested will take it up no matter what the RYA do or don't do.
The training is usefull but I don't want to pretend it's essential or we could end up with compulsory training, licensing and (even more) -ve cash flow.
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:00 pm
by Fingal
Silkie wrote:Ocklepoint wrote:There was one question that I really did not understand...
It wasn't 16 by any chance? I marked every option as a 1 and as well as giving my opinion about what I thought might make the biggest difference to boating over the next 4 years I also opined that gobbledy-gook like Q16 would have absolutely no impact.
Q16 was the absolute nadir of a very poorly framed set of questions. I didn't understand it either and I do questions (among other things) for a living.
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 8:18 pm
by DaveS
Well I filled out the form - agree with others that it's pretty cr@ppy.
A really subtle trick noticed when reading what the corporate bullsh!t "strands" meant was that the order of the answers was different to the order of the descriptions.
This was after trying to work out how 4 departments each dealing with one "strand" could produce 6 "strands".

Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 10:00 pm
by sahona
So, is there another organisation worthy of our subscription contributions? CCC?
Or do we, as the apparently unrewarded donors, simply carry on funding the Southern racers?
Seems reminiscent of the way the gentlefolk south of the border view our (Wee Eck's) devolution discussions -everybody just go their own selfish way, or ponder that there may be merit in the status quo?
Answers in small print on the margin of a white fiver to : Lydia-Jarrawurms at the usual address
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 10:25 pm
by ubergeekian
marisca wrote:I tried but found I was feeling ever more negative towards RYAS the further I went - I shall return to it tomorrow. I realised that their relevance to my sailing was almost nil.
I think their approach is clear from the first substantive questions, where they conflate keelboat and yacht sailing. I think Etchells, Loch Longs and Flying Fifteens look gorgeous and I'd happily have a go in one, but they really are completely different from yachts.
Otherwise the survey is complete mince. They give no indication of whether responses are to be based on what the RYA does or on what we would like it to do. Seems clear to me that they wrote t in order to get the go ahead to go on promoting racing and telling everyone else what to do.
Screw 'em.
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:08 pm
by Ocklepoint
Has the RYA Scotland announced the findings/results of its consultation?
Re: Why no RYA consultation in Oban?
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:33 pm
by ubergeekian
sahona wrote:So, is there another organisation worthy of our subscription contributions? CCC?
I've been tempted by the Cruising Association but (a) it's blinking expensive and (b) although I gather that a gentlemen's agreement with the CCC that the CA would not organise north of the border is no more, I don't think they do much if anything up here.
I've wondered about joining the CCC (actually rejoining, after a gap of 20+ years) but again I am not quite sure what I'd get for my money, absent an Oppiebrat wishing to play at Bardowie.