Leisure Folio
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2006 8:11 pm
Fully support plea for re-telling of grounding story! I am convinced there's something odd about the depth representations for Cuan - and the new chart claiming the channel to be 50m wide and 10m deep NE of the Cleit simply deepens (sorry!) the mystery. Now that I think of it, it may even have been a remark made by me on this subject which triggered last year's infamous rendition of the Cleit Rock story...
Returning to the (much more boring) original topic, and updating on my previous post, I have now bought a copy, and results are in line with expectations. Certainly if you haven't already got all the charts for this area I would recommend it unhesitatingly. If you already have them, then the case for purchase is maybe less convincing - but I have already spotted one or two places where the presentation is more "user friendly" than using either the conventional large or small scale charts. Oddly, Cuan is an exception with a change of charts required closer to the western entrance than using "conventionals". Real life use will presumably throw up some more pros and cons. One possible problem is that all charts are double sided (one reason for the great reduction in paper volume / weight) so I can imagine pencillings getting smudged more easily.
I unreservedly take back my previous comments on corrections. Not only does every sheet list the conventional sheets it's derived from, with their latest N to M correction numbers, but there's a separate website (http://www.admiraltyleisure.co.uk) with corrections for the Leisure Folios. This spits out a list of all corrections from issue to date - which saves lots of paper compared with the normal N to M "one per page" system.
Returning to the (much more boring) original topic, and updating on my previous post, I have now bought a copy, and results are in line with expectations. Certainly if you haven't already got all the charts for this area I would recommend it unhesitatingly. If you already have them, then the case for purchase is maybe less convincing - but I have already spotted one or two places where the presentation is more "user friendly" than using either the conventional large or small scale charts. Oddly, Cuan is an exception with a change of charts required closer to the western entrance than using "conventionals". Real life use will presumably throw up some more pros and cons. One possible problem is that all charts are double sided (one reason for the great reduction in paper volume / weight) so I can imagine pencillings getting smudged more easily.
I unreservedly take back my previous comments on corrections. Not only does every sheet list the conventional sheets it's derived from, with their latest N to M correction numbers, but there's a separate website (http://www.admiraltyleisure.co.uk) with corrections for the Leisure Folios. This spits out a list of all corrections from issue to date - which saves lots of paper compared with the normal N to M "one per page" system.